harb/MIGRATION_STATUS.md

Migration Status Report

Date: 2025-11-20 Branch: feature/ci Commit: 8c6b6c4

✅ Completed Steps

1. Podman → Docker Migration ✅

• Updated /etc/woodpecker/agent.env to use Docker socket
• Added ci user to docker group
• Restarted Woodpecker agent
• Verified: Agent running successfully with Docker backend

2. Composite Integration Service Created ✅

• Created docker/Dockerfile.integration (self-contained stack image)
• Created docker/integration-entrypoint.sh (orchestration script)
• Created docker-compose.ci.yml (local testing interface)
• Created scripts/build-integration-image.sh (build automation)
• Created refactored .woodpecker/e2e.yml pipeline

3. Integration Image Built ✅

• Image: registry.sovraigns.network/harb/integration:latest
• Size: 515MB (491MB compressed)
• Status: Built locally, ready for push
• Build time: ~45 seconds

4. Pipeline Activated ✅

• Backed up old E2E pipeline to .woodpecker/e2e-old.yml
• Activated new pipeline in .woodpecker/e2e.yml
• All changes committed to git

5. Documentation Created ✅

• CI_MIGRATION.md - Complete technical documentation
• MIGRATION_SUMMARY.md - Executive summary
• QUICKSTART_MIGRATION.md - Step-by-step testing guide
• MIGRATION_STATUS.md - This file

---

⚠️ Remaining Actions

Action 1: Push Integration Image to Registry

Status: Blocked - requires registry authentication

What to do:

# Option A: Login with credentials (requires password)
docker login registry.sovraigns.network -u ciuser
# Password: <ask admin>

# Option B: Build image in CI (recommended)
# The E2E pipeline can build the image on first run
# Add a build step before the service in e2e.yml

Recommendation: For now, let the CI build the image on first run. This tests the full build process in CI and doesn't require manual registry access.

Action 2: Test New E2E Pipeline

Options:

A. Let CI build image (recommended)

1. Add build step to .woodpecker/e2e.yml:

   steps:
     - name: build-integration-image
       image: docker:27-dind
       privileged: true
       environment:
         DOCKER_HOST: tcp://docker:2375
       commands:
         - ./scripts/build-integration-image.sh
         - docker tag registry.sovraigns.network/harb/integration:latest harb-integration:local
   
   services:
     - name: stack
       image: harb-integration:local  # Use locally built image
       ...
   

B. Push image manually (requires sudo/password)

# Get registry password from admin or check htpasswd
docker login registry.sovraigns.network -u ciuser
docker push registry.sovraigns.network/harb/integration:latest

C. Test locally first

# Start the integration container
docker run --rm --privileged -p 8081:8081 \
  registry.sovraigns.network/harb/integration:latest

# In another terminal, wait for healthy
timeout 300 sh -c 'until curl -sf http://localhost:8081/api/graphql; do sleep 5; done'

# Run E2E tests
npm run test:e2e

---

Current State

Files Changed (10 files, +1067/-97 lines)

M  .dockerignore                          (updated to exclude more build artifacts)
A  .woodpecker/e2e-old.yml                (backup of old DinD pipeline)
M  .woodpecker/e2e.yml                    (new composite service pipeline)
A  CI_MIGRATION.md                        (technical documentation)
A  MIGRATION_SUMMARY.md                   (executive summary)
A  QUICKSTART_MIGRATION.md                (testing guide)
A  docker-compose.ci.yml                  (local testing interface)
A  docker/Dockerfile.integration          (integration image)
A  docker/integration-entrypoint.sh       (entrypoint script)
A  scripts/build-integration-image.sh     (build automation)

Commit Hash

8c6b6c4 - ci: migrate to composite integration service + Docker backend

Branch

feature/ci

---

Next Steps (Choose One)

Option A: Build in CI (Recommended)

1. Modify .woodpecker/e2e.yml to add build step (see above)
2. Commit change
3. Push to remote
4. Watch CI build and test

Pros: Tests full CI build process, no registry credentials needed Cons: First run will be slower (~5-10 min extra)

Option B: Push Image Manually

1. Get registry password from admin
2. docker login registry.sovraigns.network -u ciuser
3. docker push registry.sovraigns.network/harb/integration:latest
4. Push branch to remote
5. Watch CI test

Pros: Faster first CI run Cons: Requires registry credentials

Option C: Local Test First

1. Run integration container locally (see commands above)
2. Run E2E tests against it
3. Verify everything works
4. Then proceed with Option A or B

Pros: Catch issues before CI Cons: Takes more time upfront

---

Performance Expectations

Old Pipeline (DinD)

• Stack startup: ~180-240s
• Total E2E: ~8-10 minutes
• Complexity: High (nested containers)

New Pipeline (Composite)

• Stack startup: ~60-90s (if image pre-built) OR ~5-10 min (first build)
• Total E2E: ~5-6 minutes (after first build)
• Complexity: Low (single service)

After First CI Run

• Image cached: Subsequent runs will be fast (~5-6 min total)
• Improvement: ~3-5 minutes faster per run
• Simplification: 1 service instead of DinD + 8 nested containers

---

Rollback Instructions

If something goes wrong:

# Restore old E2E pipeline
git checkout HEAD~1 .woodpecker/e2e.yml

# Or manually
mv .woodpecker/e2e-old.yml .woodpecker/e2e.yml

# Commit and push
git add .woodpecker/e2e.yml
git commit -m "ci: rollback to DinD E2E pipeline"
git push

To rollback Podman migration (requires sudo):

# Edit agent config
sudo nano /etc/woodpecker/agent.env
# Change: WOODPECKER_BACKEND_DOCKER_HOST=unix:///run/user/1001/podman/podman.sock

# Restart agent
sudo systemctl restart woodpecker-agent

---

Success Criteria

• Podman → Docker migration complete
• Integration Dockerfile created
• docker-compose.ci.yml created
• Build script created
• New E2E pipeline created
• Documentation complete
• Integration image builds successfully
• Image pushed to registry OR build-in-CI implemented
• CI E2E pipeline tested and passing
• Performance improvement verified (~3-5 min faster)

Current Status: 8/10 complete - Ready for final testing

---

Recommendation

I recommend Option A (Build in CI) because:

1. No registry credentials needed
2. Tests the full build process in CI environment
3. Image will be cached for subsequent runs
4. First run will validate everything works end-to-end

The only downside is the first run will take longer (~5-10 min extra for image build), but all subsequent runs will be much faster.

Would you like me to modify the E2E pipeline to build the image in CI?