chore: planner run 2026-03-22

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
johba 2026-03-22 14:26:40 +00:00
parent 94309cd5a6
commit b8f442eeb2
2 changed files with 62 additions and 27 deletions

View file

@ -1,34 +1,32 @@
<!-- summarized-through-run: 5 -->
# Planner Memory
## 2026-03-20 — First planner run
## 2026-03-22 — Run 5 summary
### Milestone state
<!-- Snapshot taken at run start; updated to reflect post-run state at run end. -->
- **Foundation**: COMPLETE. Agent loop, supervisor, planner, multi-project all working.
- **Adoption**: IN PROGRESS. Issues #1060 (disinto init), #1061 (docs/quickstart), #1062 (metrics dashboard) created as on-ramp; work not yet merged.
- **Scale**: PARTIALLY started (multi-project works for 3 repos).
### Bottleneck: Contract safety (unchanged since tree creation)
Contract safety is the singular bottleneck blocking all of Phase 1, Phase 2, and Phase 3. Four prerequisites remain:
- **#1031** — int256 overflow in ThreePositionStrategy._computeFloorTickWithSignal
- **#1019** — catch block skips clamping that try block applies
- **#1067** — floor ratchet attack not yet defeated (red-team data from #1085 run exists but fix not implemented)
- **#1054** — OptimizerV3 has no dedicated test file
### Evidence pipeline state
- 6 evidence dimensions defined (red-team, evolution, holdout, user-test, resources, protocol)
- 4 have formulas in harb (red-team, evolution, holdout, user-test) — all recently fixed
- 2 have NO formulas at all (resources, protocol) — filed #1059
- 0/6 dimensions have any data on disk
- #1047 blocks evolution specifically (results not committed via PR)
- Red-team is independent and was dispatched as action #1058
Only #997 (overflow guard slots 1-7) resolved across 5 runs — merged 2026-03-22. Priority labels added to #1031, #1019, #1067 to signal dev agent urgency.
### Evidence pipeline
- Red-team: has baseline data (evidence/red-team/2026-03-20.json)
- Evolution: best.push3 exists on disk but NOT committed to master — local-only
- Resources, protocol, holdout, user-test: all empty on master
- All 6 formulas exist on disk. Evidence gaps are not on the critical path — contract safety must clear first.
### Patterns
- Predictor (goblin) over-signals on evidence gaps — all 5 predictions were about missing evidence data. Expected to normalize once pipelines produce their first runs.
- High blocked:backlog ratio across projects suggests deep dependency chains. Gardener should be monitoring for circular deps.
- The factory is self-hosting successfully — all agents run, CI passes, PRs merge. The gap is external visibility, not internal capability.
- Predictor over-signals on infrastructure/dark-factory noise — most predictions dismissed as not harb-specific
- Contract safety work velocity: 1 prereq resolved per day when dev agent engages. At this rate, remaining 4 items could clear in ~4 days.
- Evolution pipeline produces output but doesn't persist to git — evolution commit-via-PR (#1047) was fixed but evidence still not appearing on master
- Three stale unlabeled issues (#517, #383, #147) noted by prediction #1105 — gardener has not triaged them across multiple runs
### Strategic direction
- Adoption is the leverage multiplier: everything in Scale depends on having users first.
- Created #1060 (disinto init), #1061 (docs), #1062 (metrics dashboard) as the Adoption on-ramp.
- #1061 depends on #1060 — quickstart needs the bootstrap flow to reference.
- #1062 (metrics dashboard) is the social proof play — show the factory working rather than just claiming it.
### Watch list
- #1020 + #1047: evolution pipeline needs commit-via-PR fix before runs produce persistent evidence
- #1022: holdout/user-test blocked on evolution data existing
- #341: stale issue (extraction already done) — gardener should close or update
- Disk at 79% — evidence formulas will add data; monitor trajectory
### Strategic context
- Phase 1 (quality gate) is entirely blocked on contract safety
- Phase 2 (launch) is blocked on Phase 1
- Phase 3 (operations) is blocked on Phase 1
- The prerequisite tree is stable — no new objectives or prerequisites discovered in runs 2-5
- Priority label system introduced in run 5 to direct dev agent attention to bottleneck issues