- _scrapePositions natspec: 'ETH inflow' → 'ETH outflow / price fell or at bootstrap' - Inline comment above VWAP block: remove inverted 'KRK sold out / ETH inflow' rationale, replace with a neutral forward-reference to recenter() where the direction logic lives - VWAPFloorProtection.t.sol: remove unused Kraiken and forge-std/Test.sol imports (both are already provided by UniSwapHelper) - test_floorConservativeAfterBuyOnlyAttack: add assertFalse(token0isWeth) guard so a future change to the setUp parameter cannot silently invert the gap-direction assertion Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
222 lines
9.1 KiB
Solidity
222 lines
9.1 KiB
Solidity
// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-3.0-or-later
|
|
pragma solidity ^0.8.19;
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
* @title VWAPFloorProtectionTest
|
|
* @notice Regression tests for issue #543: VWAP must not inflate during buy-only recenter cycles.
|
|
*
|
|
* Root cause (pre-fix): shouldRecordVWAP was true on BUY events (ETH inflow). An adversary
|
|
* running N buy-recenter cycles continuously updated VWAP upward toward the current (inflated)
|
|
* price. When VWAP ≈ currentTick the mirrorTick formula placed the floor near the current
|
|
* price, crystallising IL when the adversary finally sold all KRK.
|
|
*
|
|
* Fix: shouldRecordVWAP is now true only on SELL events (price falling / ETH outflow).
|
|
* Buy-only cycles leave VWAP frozen at the historical bootstrap level, keeping the floor
|
|
* conservatively anchored to that baseline.
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
import { LiquidityManager } from "../src/LiquidityManager.sol";
|
|
import { ThreePositionStrategy } from "../src/abstracts/ThreePositionStrategy.sol";
|
|
import { TestEnvironment } from "./helpers/TestBase.sol";
|
|
import { UniSwapHelper } from "./helpers/UniswapTestBase.sol";
|
|
|
|
contract VWAPFloorProtectionTest is UniSwapHelper {
|
|
address constant RECENTER_CALLER = address(0x7777);
|
|
|
|
LiquidityManager lm;
|
|
TestEnvironment testEnv;
|
|
address feeDestination = makeAddr("fees");
|
|
|
|
// How much ETH to give the LM and the attacker
|
|
uint256 constant LM_ETH = 100 ether;
|
|
uint256 constant ATTACKER_ETH = 2000 ether;
|
|
|
|
function setUp() public {
|
|
testEnv = new TestEnvironment(feeDestination);
|
|
(,pool, weth, harberg, , lm, , token0isWeth) =
|
|
testEnv.setupEnvironment(false, RECENTER_CALLER);
|
|
|
|
vm.deal(address(lm), LM_ETH);
|
|
|
|
// Fund the swap account used by UniSwapHelper
|
|
vm.deal(account, ATTACKER_ETH);
|
|
vm.prank(account);
|
|
weth.deposit{ value: ATTACKER_ETH / 2 }();
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// =========================================================================
|
|
// Core regression: VWAP must not inflate during buy-only cycles (#543)
|
|
// =========================================================================
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
* @notice VWAP stays at its bootstrap value throughout a buy-only attack sequence.
|
|
*
|
|
* Sequence:
|
|
* 1. First recenter → creates positions (no fees yet, VWAP not recorded).
|
|
* 2. Buy KRK (price rises) → second recenter → bootstraps VWAP (cumulativeVolume == 0).
|
|
* 3. Repeat buy + recenter several more times.
|
|
* 4. Assert getVWAP() is unchanged from the bootstrap recording.
|
|
*
|
|
* Before the fix this test would fail because every successful buy-direction recenter
|
|
* updated VWAP with the new (higher) anchor price, pulling VWAP toward currentTick.
|
|
*/
|
|
function test_vwapNotInflatedByBuyOnlyAttack() public {
|
|
// ---- step 1: initial recenter sets up positions ----
|
|
vm.prank(RECENTER_CALLER);
|
|
lm.recenter();
|
|
|
|
assertEq(lm.cumulativeVolume(), 0, "no fees collected yet: cumulativeVolume == 0");
|
|
|
|
// ---- step 2: first buy + recenter → bootstrap ----
|
|
buyRaw(25 ether); // push price up enough to satisfy amplitude check
|
|
|
|
vm.prank(RECENTER_CALLER);
|
|
lm.recenter(); // cumulativeVolume == 0 → shouldRecordVWAP = true (bootstrap path)
|
|
|
|
uint256 bootstrapVWAP = lm.getVWAP();
|
|
assertGt(bootstrapVWAP, 0, "VWAP must be recorded at bootstrap");
|
|
|
|
// ---- step 3: continued buy-only cycles ----
|
|
uint256 successfulBuyCycles;
|
|
for (uint256 i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
|
|
buyRaw(25 ether);
|
|
vm.prank(RECENTER_CALLER);
|
|
// Recenter may fail if amplitude isn't reached; that's fine.
|
|
try lm.recenter() {
|
|
successfulBuyCycles++;
|
|
} catch { }
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Ensure at least some cycles succeeded so the test is meaningful.
|
|
assertGt(successfulBuyCycles, 0, "at least one buy-recenter cycle must succeed");
|
|
|
|
// ---- step 4: VWAP must be unchanged ----
|
|
uint256 vwapAfterAttack = lm.getVWAP();
|
|
assertEq(
|
|
vwapAfterAttack,
|
|
bootstrapVWAP,
|
|
"VWAP must remain frozen at bootstrap value during buy-only cycles"
|
|
);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
* @notice The floor is anchored conservatively (far from the inflated current price)
|
|
* after a buy-only attack, making extraction unprofitable.
|
|
*
|
|
* After N buy cycles the current tick is far above the bootstrap. With VWAP frozen at
|
|
* bootstrap, mirrorTick ≈ vwapTick ≈ bootstrapTick — much further from currentTick than
|
|
* if VWAP had tracked upward. The floor therefore sits near the original distribution
|
|
* price, not the inflated price.
|
|
*/
|
|
function test_floorConservativeAfterBuyOnlyAttack() public {
|
|
vm.prank(RECENTER_CALLER);
|
|
lm.recenter();
|
|
|
|
// Bootstrap via first buy-recenter
|
|
buyRaw(25 ether);
|
|
vm.prank(RECENTER_CALLER);
|
|
lm.recenter();
|
|
|
|
// Run several buy cycles
|
|
for (uint256 i = 0; i < 6; i++) {
|
|
buyRaw(25 ether);
|
|
vm.prank(RECENTER_CALLER);
|
|
try lm.recenter() { } catch { }
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// This test is written for token0isWeth=false (set in setUp via setupEnvironment(false,...)).
|
|
// For !token0isWeth: buying KRK pushes tick UP (WETH/KRK price rises), so floor must be
|
|
// BELOW (lower tick than) the inflated current tick.
|
|
assertFalse(token0isWeth, "test assumes token0isWeth=false; update gap logic if changed");
|
|
|
|
// Read floor and current tick
|
|
(, int24 currentTick,,,,,) = pool.slot0();
|
|
(, int24 floorTickLower, int24 floorTickUpper) =
|
|
lm.positions(ThreePositionStrategy.Stage.FLOOR);
|
|
|
|
int24 floorCenter = floorTickLower + (floorTickUpper - floorTickLower) / 2;
|
|
|
|
// The floor must be BELOW the current inflated tick by a substantial margin —
|
|
// at minimum the anchor spacing plus some additional buffer from VWAP anchoring.
|
|
// We assert that the gap is at least 400 ticks (two tick spacings).
|
|
int24 gap = currentTick - floorCenter;
|
|
assertGt(gap, 400, "floor must be substantially below the inflated current tick");
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// =========================================================================
|
|
// Positive: VWAP bootstrap still works
|
|
// =========================================================================
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
* @notice The very first fee event always records VWAP regardless of direction.
|
|
*
|
|
* cumulativeVolume == 0 triggers unconditional recording to avoid the
|
|
* vwapX96 == 0 fallback path. This test confirms that path is preserved.
|
|
*/
|
|
function test_vwapBootstrapsOnFirstFeeEvent() public {
|
|
vm.prank(RECENTER_CALLER);
|
|
lm.recenter();
|
|
|
|
assertEq(lm.cumulativeVolume(), 0, "no VWAP data before first fees");
|
|
|
|
buyRaw(25 ether);
|
|
|
|
vm.prank(RECENTER_CALLER);
|
|
lm.recenter();
|
|
|
|
assertGt(lm.cumulativeVolume(), 0, "bootstrap: cumulativeVolume must be positive");
|
|
assertGt(lm.getVWAP(), 0, "bootstrap: VWAP must be positive after first fees");
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// =========================================================================
|
|
// Positive: VWAP updates when price falls (sell-side events)
|
|
// =========================================================================
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
* @notice VWAP can still be updated when price falls between recenters.
|
|
*
|
|
* Sequence:
|
|
* 1. Buy large → recenter (bootstrap VWAP at high price).
|
|
* 2. Sell all KRK → price falls below bootstrap.
|
|
* 3. Recenter with price-fall direction → shouldRecordVWAP = true.
|
|
* 4. If ETH fees were collected (buys happened in the prior cycle), VWAP updates.
|
|
* We verify at minimum that the recenter succeeds without reverting — i.e.
|
|
* the sell-direction path doesn't break the system.
|
|
*/
|
|
function test_recenterSucceedsOnSellDirectionWithoutReverts() public {
|
|
// Bootstrap
|
|
vm.prank(RECENTER_CALLER);
|
|
lm.recenter();
|
|
|
|
buyRaw(25 ether);
|
|
vm.prank(RECENTER_CALLER);
|
|
lm.recenter();
|
|
|
|
// Sell back: harberg balance of `account` from the prior buy
|
|
uint256 harbBalance = harberg.balanceOf(account);
|
|
if (harbBalance > 0) {
|
|
sellRaw(harbBalance);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Recenter with price now lower (sell direction) — must not revert
|
|
vm.prank(RECENTER_CALLER);
|
|
try lm.recenter() {
|
|
// success — sell-direction recenter works
|
|
} catch (bytes memory reason) {
|
|
// Amplitude not met is the only acceptable failure
|
|
assertEq(
|
|
keccak256(reason),
|
|
keccak256(abi.encodeWithSignature("Error(string)", "amplitude not reached.")),
|
|
"unexpected revert in sell-direction recenter"
|
|
);
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// =========================================================================
|
|
// getLiquidityManager override for UniSwapHelper boundary helpers
|
|
// =========================================================================
|
|
|
|
function getLiquidityManager() external view override returns (ThreePositionStrategy) {
|
|
return ThreePositionStrategy(address(lm));
|
|
}
|
|
}
|