# The hAIrberger Protocol ## Problem / Current Situation: A static liquidity provider strategy in a dynamic market leads to: - impermanent loss - reduced earnings Kraiken's baseline-like liquidity setup can reduce impermanent loss only at the cost of liquidity share and fee earnings. Token-printing-priviliges gives unfair advantage, but not forever. ## Succesfull/Dynamic LP strategies use indicators: onchain: - current and historic price - current and historic volume - current and historic liquidity distribution offchain: - TA - Macro - Sentiment ## Making the Kraiken LP strategy dynamic - **Oracle Problem \#1:** The offchain indicators can not be used by decentralized communities at all, having a unsolved oracle trust issue. - use staking, an egoistic marketplace, as data source for sentiment - % staked - average tax rate => egoistic oracle marketplace - **Using historic data:** The onchain indicators need to be digested, e.g. TA to get signals. - algorithmic trading / backtesting => model => deep learning - fold historic data into AI model training - **Oracle Problem \#2:** Any algorithm running offchain can not be trusted by community. AI models can not run onchain. Trained models can't react to real-time data (see LMM knowledge cutoff). - use on-chain algorithm that works with real-time data, historic knowledge and limited gas => **follow-up problem:** "write an algorithm that uses limited gas to maximize fees earned, starting with no training data." - **Metaheuristic:** is a higher-level procedure designed to find, generate, and tune partial search algorithm that may provide a sufficiently good solution to a machine learning problem, especially with incomplete or imperfect information or limited computation capacity. - **Genetic algorithms** are used to generate solutions to optimization problems via biologically inspired operators such as selection, crossover, and mutation. - selection can be applied on: - gas usage - fees earned after running scenarios - scenarios can be replaced by historic trading data after launch of project - result of evolution (latest generation) can be deployed onchain and integrated into recenter - recenter() => getDynamicLiqParams() => _scrapePositions() => _setPositions() - function getDynamicLiqParams(inputs) returns (params) is an EA living in upgradeable contract => **follow-up problem:** EVM op-codes can not be used in Evolution, too much grammar => **follow-up problem:** upgradeable contract needs governance - **Evolving Stack Machines** instead of reverting, invalid op-codes should be ignored. - [Push3 by Lee Spector](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ryW9w5cAwaI) => implement Push3 runtime in solidity - **Governance** tbd ## Conclusion - a dynamic strategy is possible, first using human-generated solutions (sentiment function), and later upgrading into GA. - basic governance to be solved before GA.