Commit graph

3 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
openhands
0d3aee15b4 fix: address AI review findings for #706 recenterAccess removal
- DeployBase.sol: remove broken inline second recenter() (would always
  revert with 'recenter cooldown' in same Forge broadcast); replace with
  operator instructions to run the new BootstrapVWAPPhase2.s.sol script
  at least 60 s after deployment
- BootstrapVWAPPhase2.s.sol: new script for the second VWAP bootstrap
  recenter on Base mainnet deployments
- StrategyExecutor.sol: update stale docstring that still described the
  removed recenterAccess bypass; reflect permissionless model with vm.warp
- TestBase.sol: remove vestigial recenterCaller parameter from all four
  setupEnvironment* functions (parameter was silently ignored after
  setRecenterAccess was removed); update all callers across six test files
- bootstrap-common.sh: fix misleading retry recenter in
  seed_application_state() — add evm_increaseTime 61 before evm_mine so
  the recenter cooldown actually clears and the retry can succeed

All 210 tests pass.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-03-14 09:15:48 +00:00
openhands
1a410a30b7 fix: Remove recenterAccess — make recenter() public with TWAP enforcement (#706) 2026-03-13 22:32:53 +00:00
openhands
d581b8394b fix(onchain): resolve KRK token supply corruption during recenter (#98)
PROBLEM:
Recenter operations were burning ~137,866 KRK tokens instead of minting
them, causing severe deflation when inflation should occur. This was due
to the liquidity manager burning ALL collected tokens from old positions
and then minting tokens for new positions separately, causing asymmetric
supply adjustments to the staking pool.

ROOT CAUSE:
During recenter():
1. _scrapePositions() collected tokens from old positions and immediately
   burned them ALL (+ proportional staking pool adjustment)
2. _setPositions() minted tokens for new positions (+ proportional
   staking pool adjustment)
3. The burn and mint operations used DIFFERENT totalSupply values in
   their proportion calculations, causing imbalanced adjustments
4. When old positions had more tokens than new positions needed, the net
   result was deflation

WHY THIS HAPPENED:
When KRK price increases (users buying), the same liquidity depth
requires fewer KRK tokens. The old code would:
- Burn 120k KRK from old positions (+ 30k from staking pool)
- Mint 10k KRK for new positions (+ 2.5k to staking pool)
- Net: -137.5k KRK total supply (WRONG!)

FIX:
1. Modified uniswapV3MintCallback() to use existing KRK balance first
   before minting new tokens
2. Removed burn() from _scrapePositions() - keep collected tokens
3. Removed burn() from end of recenter() - don't burn "excess"
4. Tokens held by LiquidityManager are already excluded from
   outstandingSupply(), so they don't affect staking calculations

RESULT:
Now during recenter, only the NET difference is minted or used:
- Collect old positions into LiquidityManager balance
- Use that balance for new positions
- Only mint additional tokens if more are needed
- Keep any unused balance for future recenters
- No more asymmetric burn/mint causing supply corruption

VERIFICATION:
- All 107 existing tests pass
- Added 2 new regression tests in test/SupplyCorruption.t.sol
- testRecenterDoesNotCorruptSupply: verifies single recenter preserves supply
- testMultipleRecentersPreserveSupply: verifies no accumulation over time

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-02-04 16:20:57 +00:00