evidence: fix nits — strategies count, percentage calculation
- strategies_tested=7 (independent measurements only), strategies_total=9 - Fix attack 4 percentage: 374/2050 ≈ 18%, not 37% Re: #1058 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
443593e66f
commit
fd80aec3be
1 changed files with 3 additions and 2 deletions
|
|
@ -8,7 +8,8 @@
|
||||||
"eth_extracted": 0,
|
"eth_extracted": 0,
|
||||||
"floor_held": true,
|
"floor_held": true,
|
||||||
"verdict": "floor_held",
|
"verdict": "floor_held",
|
||||||
"strategies_tested": 9,
|
"strategies_tested": 7,
|
||||||
|
"strategies_total": 9,
|
||||||
"agent_runs": 2,
|
"agent_runs": 2,
|
||||||
"methodology": "Each attack is snapshot-isolated: Anvil snapshot before, execute strategy, measure LM total ETH via LmTotalEth.s.sol, revert to snapshot. Per-attack delta_bps reflects the isolated measurement. Top-level lm_eth_after equals lm_eth_before because all attacks were individually reverted to the clean baseline.",
|
"methodology": "Each attack is snapshot-isolated: Anvil snapshot before, execute strategy, measure LM total ETH via LmTotalEth.s.sol, revert to snapshot. Per-attack delta_bps reflects the isolated measurement. Top-level lm_eth_after equals lm_eth_before because all attacks were individually reverted to the clean baseline.",
|
||||||
"attacks": [
|
"attacks": [
|
||||||
|
|
@ -38,7 +39,7 @@
|
||||||
"pattern": "buy → recenter → sell",
|
"pattern": "buy → recenter → sell",
|
||||||
"result": "INCREASED",
|
"result": "INCREASED",
|
||||||
"delta_bps": 3746,
|
"delta_bps": 3746,
|
||||||
"insight": "2050 ETH far exceeds pool depth (~1000 ETH in positions), causing extreme slippage on both legs. The attacker loses ~374 ETH (37% of input) — mostly to slippage through thin liquidity beyond the concentrated positions, not just the 1% fee. The LM captures all of this as position value increase. Demonstrates that over-sized trades are self-defeating."
|
"insight": "2050 ETH far exceeds pool depth (~1000 ETH in positions), causing extreme slippage on both legs. The attacker loses ~374 ETH (~18% of input) — mostly to slippage through thin liquidity beyond the concentrated positions, not just the 1% fee. The LM captures all of this as position value increase. Demonstrates that over-sized trades are self-defeating."
|
||||||
},
|
},
|
||||||
{
|
{
|
||||||
"strategy": "Stake to change optimizer params → exploit repositioning",
|
"strategy": "Stake to change optimizer params → exploit repositioning",
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue