chore: planner run — Phase 1 complete, bottleneck shifts to Phase 2 (#1157)
Automated planner run — prerequisite tree update and journal entry. ## Changes - Phase 1 marked DONE (E2E quality gate, conversion funnel, analytics, release pipeline) - Bottleneck shifted to Phase 2 launch preparation - New issues filed: #1155 (pitch deck), #1156 (wallet connector fix) - Predictions triaged: #1148→#1154, #1149 dismissed, #1150 dismissed, #1141 watching, #1104 dismissed - Priority labels applied to #1154, #1155, #1156 Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/johba/harb/pulls/1157
This commit is contained in:
parent
e16f342c81
commit
3f0c8d5342
5 changed files with 93 additions and 55 deletions
|
|
@ -1,32 +1 @@
|
|||
[
|
||||
{
|
||||
"action": "edit_body",
|
||||
"issue": 1086,
|
||||
"body": "Flagged by AI reviewer in PR #1065.\n\n## Problem\n\nBoth `candidate_commit` and `methodology` were added to `evidence/README.md` without a corresponding schema update. Future red-team runners have no schema definition for these fields, and automated validators may reject the file.\n\n## Affected files\n\n- `evidence/README.md` — add schema entries for `candidate_commit` and `methodology` fields\n\n## Acceptance criteria\n\n- [ ] `evidence/README.md` schema section defines the `candidate_commit` field (commit SHA of the optimizer candidate under test)\n- [ ] `evidence/README.md` schema section defines the `methodology` field (how the red-team run was conducted, e.g. snapshot-isolation)\n- [ ] Schema changes are backward-compatible with existing evidence JSON files\n\n## Related\n\n- #1083 (sibling — snapshot-isolation methodology doc for lm_eth fields)\n\n---\n*Auto-created from AI review of PR #1065*"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"action": "add_label",
|
||||
"issue": 1086,
|
||||
"label": "backlog"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"action": "edit_body",
|
||||
"issue": 1083,
|
||||
"body": "Flagged by AI reviewer in PR #1065.\n\n## Problem\n\n`evidence/README.md` is silent on whether `lm_eth_before`/`lm_eth_after` reflect cumulative or per-attack-reverted state. Now that snapshot isolation is the standard practice, the schema should define this so the fields are unambiguous to future test runners and the planner.\n\n## Affected files\n\n- `evidence/README.md` — add snapshot-isolation methodology section defining lm_eth field semantics\n\n## Acceptance criteria\n\n- [ ] `evidence/README.md` schema defines that `lm_eth_before`/`lm_eth_after` reflect per-attack state after snapshot isolation (not cumulative historical balance)\n- [ ] Schema clarifies that each attack begins from the same initial state via `vm.snapshot()`/`vm.revertTo()`\n- [ ] Schema clarifies that snapshot isolation is the standard methodology for all red-team runs\n\n## Related\n\n- #1086 (sibling — candidate_commit and methodology field schema)\n\n---\n*Auto-created from AI review of PR #1065*"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"action": "add_label",
|
||||
"issue": 1083,
|
||||
"label": "backlog"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"action": "remove_label",
|
||||
"issue": 1099,
|
||||
"label": "blocked"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"action": "comment",
|
||||
"issue": 1099,
|
||||
"body": "Unblocked: all upstream prerequisites (#1031, #997, #1067, #1054) closed. Dev-agent attempted PR #1139 but CI exhausted — blocked label removed so issue re-enters the queue for retry."
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
[]
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue